The Reformed Analysis

July 2000


Page 3 of 4

Back to page 2        [Back to page 1]

 

     On September 6th, 1819, Jefferson wrote:

“The Constitution is a mere thing of wax in the hands of the judiciary, which they may twist and shape into any form they please.”

One year later on September 28th, 1820 he wrote to William Jarvis:

“You seem to consider the judges as the ultimate arbiters of all Constitutional questions; a very dangerous doctrine indeed, and one which would please us under the despotism of an oligarchy. Our judges are as honest as other men, and not more so... And their power is the more dangerous, as they are in office for life and not responsible, as the other functionaries are to the elective control. The Constitution has erected no such single tribunal, knowing that to whatever hands confined, with

corruptions of time and party, its members would become despots.”

Jefferson saw as early as 1820 the potential problems of the Supreme Court Judiciary System. Truly he was a man with clear vision of the problems of the future, knowing the corrupt nature of man’s heart.

He wrote again in 1821, to Mr. Hammond.

“The germ of dissolution of our federal government is in the federal judiciary; an irresponsible body, (for impeachment is scarcely a scare crow) working like gravity by night and by day, gaining a little today and a little tomorrow, and advancing its noiseless step like a thief, over the field of jurisdiction, until all shall be usurped from the States.”

There can be little doubt as to the intentions of Thomas Jefferson when it concerned the advancement of the Christian faith in the everyday aspects of life in America. For Jefferson, Educational, Governmental, Social, and even Economic aspects of life had to be conformed to Biblical principles, if the Republic of the united States was to remain healthy.

In an attack against perverting the Constitution, Jefferson wrote to Justice William Johnson, on June 12th 1823.

“On every question of construction, carry ourselves back to the time when the Constitution was adopted, recollect the spirit manifested in the debates, and instead of trying what meaning may be squeezed out of the text, or invented against it, conform to the probable one in which it was passed.”



      In establishing the University of Virginia, Thomas Jefferson not only encouraged the teaching of the Christian Religion, and the Laws of God, but set aside a place in the Rotunda for chapel services. Also, in his home town, he advocated the use of the courthouse for religious services.

Jefferson stated:

“A more beautiful or precious morsel of ethics I have never seen; it is a document in proof that I am a real Christian; that is to say, a disciple of the doctrines of Jesus.”

Perhaps another great statement of evidence that the Christian religion was to be an intimate part of American Education was this declaration.

“Had the doctrines of Jesus been preached always as pure as they came from His lips, the whole civilized world would now have been Christians... I have little doubt that the whole country [America] will soon be rallied to the unity of our Creator, and I hope, to the pure doctrines of Jesus also.”

While it is true that Jefferson may have been more Unitarian than Orthodox in his Christian stand, he did, however, apply the principles of the Scriptures wonderfully to civil life.

THE OLD PATH

Thus saith the LORD, Stand ye in the ways, and see, and ask for the old paths, where [is] the good way, and walk therein, and ye shall find rest for your souls. But they said, We will not walk [therein]. (Jeremiah 6:16 AV)

What did the Founders of this Nation know concerning Righteousness and Justice? The answer is clear. They understood that in order to establish, and maintain a proper, and thriving cultures, it must be founded upon the Principles of the Holy Scriptures.

In the 16th, 17th and 18th centuries, this, not only was an accepted truth, it was an embraced truth. America and its institutions, especially education, was based upon Christian precepts and Laws. To deny this fact, is to deny the very history that bears record of it.

 


 

Conclusion on page 4...

 

 

 

 

Additional issues of "The Reformed Analysis"

Also available:

The Reformed Witness

Other articles by Pastor Paul Michael Raymond

 

 

 

 

www.HisGlory.com

 

 

 

 

Hit Counter

 

 

 

 

 

 

01/19/02