The Reformed Analysis

Aug-Sept 2000


Page 3 of 4

Back to page 2        [Back to page 1]

 

     
“My only business is to declare that all its
[Christian] doctrines and precepts are calculated to promote the happiness of society, and the safety and well being of civil government. A Christian cannot fail of being a republican.”

Rush argued successfully that the purpose of true education was not to make scholars, but rather men, citizens and Christians. He declared that all educational systems should establish principled virtues of character first, and academic ability second.

“A Christian cannot fail of being useful to the Republic, for his Religion teacheth him, that “no man liveth unto himself...For every precept of the Gospel inculcates those degrees of humility, self-denial, and brotherly kindness which are directly opposed to the pride of the pageantry of the monarchy and the pageantry of a court.”

Benjamin Rush also stressed the individual duty of every citizen to the Creator, the God of the Bible. His focus was upon their moral obligation to God and righteousness. In his writings, Doctor Rush set forth a series of Biblical rules and statues that were meant to ensure that the Scriptures would be used as the Source-Book of all proper and profitable education in every school system. Sadly, today Doctor Rush would not even be allowed in the government schools with his Bible, let alone his system of rules promoting its worth to the education process!

THE BIBLE AS THE ONLY SCHOOL BOOK

In his 1791 letter to the Reverend Jeremy Belknap of Boston, Dr. Rush expounded his reasons and arguments for the Bible as the Source Book for public schools. He begins his argument by assuming five principle propositions.

I. That Christianity is the only True and Perfect Religion, and that in proportion, as mankind adopt its principles, and obey its precepts, they will be wise and happy.

II. That a better knowledge of this Religion is to be acquired by reading the Bible, than by any other way.

III. That the Bible contains more knowledge necessary to man in his present state than any other book in the world.

IV. That knowledge is most durable, and Religious instruction most useful, when imparted in early life.

V. That the Bible, when not read in schools, is seldom read in any subsequent period of life.

      

Dr. Rush continues his thesis by arguing that because the memory is the first faculty which opens in the minds of children, “how much consequence it must be to impress it with the great truths of Christianity, before it is pre-occupied with less interesting subjects.” He further argues that it is precisely the mind of the child which is able to grasp Religious attitudes. They have a “peculiar aptitude” for the things of God and His Holy Word.

Rush reasoned that during the first seven years of a child’s life they were more inquisitive as to the things of God than at any other time. Consequently, to stifle or oppress this natural inquisition is to defraud and ultimately destroy the child. Such is the plan of the present day education system of the government-controlled humanistic schools.

Rush also argued for the particular use of the Scriptures in the schools from the point of Covenant and Commandment. Sighting the sixth chapter of Deuteronomy, he sought to call mankind into account, that they might seek God’s Laws in open acknowledgement because they are accountable to Him. Since man was created in God’s image, and because they had been specifically commanded to be educated through the Scriptures, Rush realized the Covenantal and Legal implications the Bible had to play in the schools. He stated,

“We err not only in human affairs, but in Religion likewise, only because “we do not know the Scriptures. But further, we err, not only in Religion but in philosophy likewise, because we “do not believe the Scriptures.”

Rush cautioned that to profess to be “wiser than our Maker” would consequently be our eternal and temporal ruin.

“Let us not be wiser than our Maker. If moral precepts alone could have reformed mankind, the mission of the Son of God into our world, would have been unnecessary. He came to promulgate a system of doctrines, as well as a system of morals. The perfect morality of the Gospel rests upon a doctrine, which though often controverted, has never been refuted.”

 “This sublime and ineffable doctrine [of the Lord Jesus Christ and His Gospel] delivers us from the absurd hypotheses of modern philosophers, concerning the foundation of moral obligation.”

He continues by stating:

“By withholding the knowledge of this doctrine [i.e. the Gospel of Christ] from children, we deprive ourselves of the best means of awakening moral sensibility in their minds.”

It is this Doctrine and these truths that the present government system has successfully oppressed in the public education system.

Conclusion on page 4...

 

 

 

 

Additional issues of "The Reformed Analysis"

Also available:

The Reformed Witness

Other articles by Pastor Paul Michael Raymond

 

 

 

 

www.HisGlory.com

 

 

 

 

Hit Counter

 

 

 

 

 

 

01/19/02